Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
articles:as9100d_oe_requirements [2019/08/10 15:25]
rrandall
articles:as9100d_oe_requirements [2019/08/10 15:27] (current)
rrandall
Line 37: Line 37:
 <note important>​**#​ 9** \\ The IAQG official [[https://​www.sae.org/​iaqg/​projects/​9100-2016_clarification_table.pdf|"​AS 9100:2016 Series Clarifications"​]] states: //The 9100-series clause 7.1.5.2 was not intended to force organizations to have the register specifically include the "​equipment type, unique identification,​ location, and the calibration or verification method, frequency, and acceptance criteria.” The organization is required to have this information for equipment listed on the calibration register but not specifically in the register.// \\ Almost no one identifies the “method” or “acceptance criteria” in their “register” (database)... unless they have a full in-house calibration laboratory. What auditors typically see is: \\ 1. the “method” identified on the calibration certificate (from the calibration/​metrology lab). \\ 2. the  “acceptance criteria” either identified in the calibration certificate (from the calibration/​metrology lab) OR for the company to have a copy of the calibration “method” that was used (containing the acceptance criteria). \\ \\ While the company could have the instrument specifications,​ if those specifications can’t be matched to the actual calibration method used, then there is no way to confirm that was the actual “acceptance criteria” used in performing the calibration.</​note>​ <note important>​**#​ 9** \\ The IAQG official [[https://​www.sae.org/​iaqg/​projects/​9100-2016_clarification_table.pdf|"​AS 9100:2016 Series Clarifications"​]] states: //The 9100-series clause 7.1.5.2 was not intended to force organizations to have the register specifically include the "​equipment type, unique identification,​ location, and the calibration or verification method, frequency, and acceptance criteria.” The organization is required to have this information for equipment listed on the calibration register but not specifically in the register.// \\ Almost no one identifies the “method” or “acceptance criteria” in their “register” (database)... unless they have a full in-house calibration laboratory. What auditors typically see is: \\ 1. the “method” identified on the calibration certificate (from the calibration/​metrology lab). \\ 2. the  “acceptance criteria” either identified in the calibration certificate (from the calibration/​metrology lab) OR for the company to have a copy of the calibration “method” that was used (containing the acceptance criteria). \\ \\ While the company could have the instrument specifications,​ if those specifications can’t be matched to the actual calibration method used, then there is no way to confirm that was the actual “acceptance criteria” used in performing the calibration.</​note>​
  
-<note important>​**#​ 11** \\ When asked whether clause no. 8.5.1a) of ISO 9001:2015 "​availability of documented information"​ means "​maintain documented information”,​ the  +<note important>​**#​ 11** \\ When asked whether clause no. 8.5.1a) of ISO 9001:2015 "​availability of documented information"​ means "​maintain documented information”,​ the " 
-[[https://​committee.iso.org/​files/​live/​sites/​tc176sc2/​files/​documents/​Interpretations/​ISO9001_2015_Approved_Interpretations.doc|Official ISO 9001:2015 Inerpretations from ISO TC/​176/​SC2]] ​responded ​"​No"​. And explained "//The terms “available” and “maintain” are not synonyms, and the use of “availability” was deliberate. “Available” means “able to be used or obtained, or accessible”,​ whereas “maintain” means “cause or enable to continue”. The “maintenance” of documented information is not explicitly required by Clause 8.5.1(a), but is addressed by other parts of ISO 9001:2015. Clause 8.5.1 (a) requires the documented information to be “available” so that it can be used, not just “maintained” (i.e. preserved). The documented information that needs to be available under Clause 8.5.1(a) is part of the quality management system documentation,​ and therefore has to be managed in accordance with Clause 7.5.//"​.</​note>​+[[https://​committee.iso.org/​files/​live/​sites/​tc176sc2/​files/​documents/​Interpretations/​ISO9001_2015_Approved_Interpretations.doc|Official ISO 9001:2015 Inerpretations from ISO TC/​176/​SC2]]" stated ​"​No"​. And explained "//The terms “available” and “maintain” are not synonyms, and the use of “availability” was deliberate. “Available” means “able to be used or obtained, or accessible”,​ whereas “maintain” means “cause or enable to continue”. The “maintenance” of documented information is not explicitly required by Clause 8.5.1(a), but is addressed by other parts of ISO 9001:2015. Clause 8.5.1 (a) requires the documented information to be “available” so that it can be used, not just “maintained” (i.e. preserved). The documented information that needs to be available under Clause 8.5.1(a) is part of the quality management system documentation,​ and therefore has to be managed in accordance with Clause 7.5.//"​.</​note>​