Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:iso_globalist_agenda [2020/03/01 14:27] – [How ISO is using Management Systems Standards to promote Globalism] rrandallarticles:iso_globalist_agenda [2020/03/19 21:28] – [ISO 9001:2015 and the “Made in China 2025" (MIC) Policy initiative] rrandall
Line 103: Line 103:
 For ISO 9001:2015, and several other ISO management system standards, this was primarily accomplished through “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” (Annex SL) mandating standardized language to be used in ALL ISO management system standards. This was done under the pretext of promoting consistency in integrated management systems. For ISO 9001:2015, and several other ISO management system standards, this was primarily accomplished through “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” (Annex SL) mandating standardized language to be used in ALL ISO management system standards. This was done under the pretext of promoting consistency in integrated management systems.
  
-After some joint ISO/IEC management system standards (e.g. ISO 17020, ISO/IEC 17025) refused to adopt the Annex SL format, the “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” was revised (2019-05) such that Annex SL was re-named Annex L and its scope expanded to include IEC standards (in effect, “strong-arming” them). From the perspective of the standards developers opposing “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1”, perhaps ISO should modify their logo to more closely resemble the modified Federation logo in [[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708438/|"Star Trek: The Original Series", season 2, episode 4 titled "Mirror, Mirror"]]. +After some joint ISO/IEC management system standards (e.g. ISO 17020, ISO/IEC 17025) refused to adopt the Annex SL format, the “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” was revised (2019-05) such that Annex SL was re-named Annex L and its scope expanded to include IEC standards (in effect, “strong-arming” them). From the perspective of the standards developers opposing “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1”, perhaps ISO should modify their logo to more closely resemble the Federation logo seen in [[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708438/|"Star Trek: The Original Series", season 2, episode 4 titled "Mirror, Mirror"]]. 
  
 An example of how ISO promotes communist and socialist ideologies can be found when reading ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2 “Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties”. And it accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176). An example of how ISO promotes communist and socialist ideologies can be found when reading ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2 “Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties”. And it accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176).
Line 127: Line 127:
 The inability of China's communist leadership to understand the concepts of free-trade and free markets led to several miscalculations in dealing with the Trump Administration. On March 22, 2018, the USTR (Office of the United States Trade Representative) announced “action against four broad Chinese MIC policies, including (1) forced technology transfer, (2) unfair licensing requirements, (3) government-backed cyber-theft of U.S. trade secrets, and (4) efforts by China to acquire U.S. technology and IP through acquisitions to support its industrial plans.”((Source: The Made in China 2025 Initiative: Economic Implications for the United States - Updated April 12, 2019)) The inability of China's communist leadership to understand the concepts of free-trade and free markets led to several miscalculations in dealing with the Trump Administration. On March 22, 2018, the USTR (Office of the United States Trade Representative) announced “action against four broad Chinese MIC policies, including (1) forced technology transfer, (2) unfair licensing requirements, (3) government-backed cyber-theft of U.S. trade secrets, and (4) efforts by China to acquire U.S. technology and IP through acquisitions to support its industrial plans.”((Source: The Made in China 2025 Initiative: Economic Implications for the United States - Updated April 12, 2019))
  
-Even after a reduction of reliance of China (due to tarrifs), during February 2020 the United States Stock Market felt the effects of US industry remaining so heavily dependent upon China.+Even after a reduction of reliance of China (due to tarrifs), during February 2020 the United States Stock Market felt the effects of US industry remaining so heavily dependent upon China when the COVID-19 pandemic began sweeping the world.