Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- articles:nist_traceability [2020/01/23 10:16] – [Conclusion] rrandall
+++ articles:nist_traceability [2023/02/01 18:32] (current) – [What are "International Standards"?] rrandall
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 <WRAP center round box 80%>
-**[[https://www.nist.gov/document/gmp-13-ensuring-traceability-20180213docx|NIST GMP 13, "Good Measurement Practice
+**[[https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2019/06/21/gmp-13-ensuring-traceability-20190621.pdf|NIST GMP 13, "Good Measurement Practice
 for Ensuring Metrological Traceability”]], sec. 1.1 (3rd para.):** \\
 "//Test numbers issued by NIST should not be used nor required as proof of the adequacy or traceability of a test or measurement. Having a NIST number does not provide evidence that the measurement value provided by another organization has the property of metrological traceability.//"
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 And
 <WRAP center round box 80%>
-**[[https://www.nist.gov/document/gmp-13-ensuring-traceability-20180213docx|NIST GMP 13, "Good Measurement Practice
+**[[https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2019/06/21/gmp-13-ensuring-traceability-20190621.pdf|NIST GMP 13, "Good Measurement Practice
-for Ensuring Metrological Traceability”]], sec. 1.3.3, "Use of, or reference to, official test numbers of a national metrology institute":** \\
+for Ensuring Metrological Traceability”]], sec. 1.6.3, "Use of, or reference to, official test numbers of a national metrology institute.":** \\
-"//Having an authentic test number does not provide assurance or evidence that the measurement value provided by another organization is traceable. Not only must there be an unbroken chain of comparisons, but each measurement must be accompanied by a statement of uncertainty associated with the value. Test report numbers should not be used nor required as proof of the adequacy or traceability of a test or measurement. National and international standards dealing with test and measurement quality requirements, such as ISO 10012, ISO/IEC 17025 and the ISO 9000 series do not require the use or reporting of specific test numbers to establish traceability.//"
+"//Having an authentic test number does not provide assurance or evidence that the measurement value provided by another organization is traceable. Not only must there be an unbroken chain of comparisons, but each measurement must be accompanied by a statement of uncertainty associated with the value. Test report numbers should not be used nor required as proof of the adequacy or traceability of a test or measurement. National and international documentary standards for test and measurement quality requirements, such as ISO 10012, ISO/IEC 17025 and the ISO 9000 series, provide guidance for assessing metrological traceability and do not require the use or reporting of specific test numbers to establish metrological traceability.//"
 </WRAP>
 This is further noted in the:
@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 Sec. 820.72 Inspection, measuring, and test equipment. \\
 (b) (1) Calibration standards. Calibration standards used for inspection, measuring, and test equipment shall be __traceable to national or international standards__. If national or international standards are not practical or available, the manufacturer shall use an independent reproducible standard. If no applicable standard exists, the manufacturer shall establish and maintain an in-house standard.</WRAP>
+Similar antiquated language appears in [[http://everyspec.com/MIL-STD/MIL-STD-1300-1399/MIL-STD-1309D_87/|MIL-STD-1309D]], (12 February 1992), which doesn't even recognize international standards or offer alternatives where no national measurement standards exist:
+<WRAP center round box 80%>**MIL-STD-1309D, "Definitions of Terms for Testing, Measurement and Diagnostics"**\\
+.1.653 Traceability. The ability to relate individual measurement results to __national standards or nationally accepted measurement systems__ through an unbroken chain of comparisons.
+</WRAP>
 In contrast, ISO 17025:2017 is much more modern and technically correct in stating:\\
@@ Line 79: / Line 84: @@
 Also, while not strictly speaking a National Metrology Institute (NMI), the [[https://www.bipm.org|"Bureau International des Poids et Mesures" (BIPM)]] offers [[https://www.bipm.org/en/bipm-services/|calibration & Measurement services]] (with traceability to SI Units) to its [[https://www.bipm.org/en/about-us/member-states/|Member States]]. In that instance, the BIPM would serve as equivalent to a NMI.
+Transcat has an excellent White Paper on this topic at: [[https://www.transcat.com/calibration-resources/white-papers/what-is-measurement-traceability]].
 ===== What are SI Units? =====
 {{ :articles:2018-si.png?direct&130|}}
@@ Line 94: / Line 101: @@
 </WRAP>
-SI Units are also explained on the NIST web site at: https://www.nist.gov/pml/weights-and-measures/metric-si/si-units and in "[[https://www.nist.gov/pml/special-publication-330|NIST Special Publication 330 -  The International System of Units (SI)]]". Both NIST sources will likely be updated soon to reflect the new definitions to the SI that went into effect on May 20, 2019.
+SI Units are also explained on the NIST web site at: https://www.nist.gov/pml/weights-and-measures/metric-si/si-units and in "[[https://www.nist.gov/pml/special-publication-330|NIST Special Publication 330 -  The International System of Units (SI)]]".
 ===== What are "intrinsic" standards? =====
@@ Line 144: / Line 151: @@
 Source: The "Bureau International des Poids et Mesures" (BIPM) [[https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2012.pdf|JCGM 200:2012, "International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)"]] (3rd edition), sec. 5.2.
 </WRAP>
 I am aware of only four (4) "international standards" (as opposed to SI //units//); three of which are listed as examples in the definition shown above. However, there are probably others. Those that I am aware of include: \\
@@ Line 158: / Line 158: @@
 The only SI unit "physical artifact" (i.e., not defined by a fundamental, natural constant), the international prototype kilogram (IPK), was certified in 1889, and consists of a cylinder of platinum-iridium. The IPK is maintained by the [[https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/kilogram.html|BIPM]].
-<note>Because the IPKs stability has been a matter of significant concern, during November 2018, the world’s measurement experts voted and unanimously approved a revision of the SI that establishes a measurement system entirely based on physical constants of nature. The changes took effect on [[http://www.worldmetrologyday.org|World Metrology Day]], May 20, 2019; which commemorates the anniversary of the signing of the Metre Convention in 1875. See [[https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/13/18087002/kilogram-new-definition-kg-metric-unit-ipk-measurement|The Kilogram is Dead; Long Live the Kilogram]]</note>
+<WRAP center round info 80%>
+Because the IPKs stability has been a matter of significant concern, during November 2018, the world’s measurement experts voted and unanimously approved a revision of the SI that establishes a measurement system entirely based on physical constants of nature. The changes took effect on [[http://www.worldmetrologyday.org|World Metrology Day]], May 20, 2019; which commemorates the anniversary of the signing of the Metre Convention in 1875. See [[https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/13/18087002/kilogram-new-definition-kg-metric-unit-ipk-measurement|The Kilogram is Dead; Long Live the Kilogram]]
+</WRAP>
 **2 - Chorionic Gonadotrophin (Biological standard)** \\
 Defined by the [[http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70154/WHO_BS_09.2107_eng.pdf|World Health Organization (WHO)]] in the 4th international standard 1999, as 75/589, 650 International Units per ampoule.