Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:preventive_action_not_equal_to_risks_and_opportunities [2019/11/15 17:24] – [Conclusion] rrandallarticles:preventive_action_not_equal_to_risks_and_opportunities [2019/11/24 13:15] – [Preventive Action ≠ Risks and Opportunities?] rrandall
Line 18: Line 18:
 Compounding the confusion, someone decided to use the same form for both corrective and preventive action (CAPA).  Compounding the confusion, someone decided to use the same form for both corrective and preventive action (CAPA). 
  
-ISO 9001:2015 replaced the concept of “preventive action” with the more expanded “risks and opportunities” (in section 6.1). And a definition for “risk” was added to the ISO 9000:2015, “//Quality management systems–Fundamentals and Vocabulary//”. Unfortunately, ISO struggles with properly defining the word "risk" (Ref.: [[articles:a_matter_of_risk|A Matter of "Risk"]]). So, for the sake of simplicity, let's use the definition contained in [[https://www.monogramwebstore.org/publications/item.cgi?7a832d46-1fb0-4650-a57e-963108b9f71d|API Spec Q1, "Specification for Quality Management System Requirements for Manufacturing Organizations for the Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry" (Ninth Edition, June 2013)]], published by the [[https://www.api.org|American Petroleum Institute (API)]].  +ISO 9001:2015 replaced the concept of “preventive action” with the more expanded “risks and opportunities” (in section 6.1). Upon reading ISO 9001:2015, take note that it repeatedly uses the term “//risks and opportunities//” as __two separate concepts__ throughout the standard (in sections 4.4f, 5.1.2b, 6.1, 9.1.3e, 9.3.2e & 10.2.1e). 
- +
-<blockquote>**API Spec Q1** \\ +
-3.1.19 risk \\ +
-Situation or circumstance that has both a likelihood of occurring and a potentially negative consequence.</blockquote> +
- +
-Upon reading ISO 9001:2015, take note that it repeatedly uses the term “//risks and opportunities//” as __two separate concepts__ throughout the standard (in sections 4.4f, 5.1.2b, 6.1, 9.1.3e, 9.3.2e & 10.2.1e). +
  
 While not defined in ISO 9000:2015 or ISO 9001:2015, the term "//risks and opportunities//" is defined in ISO 14001:2015, "//Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use//". While not defined in ISO 9000:2015 or ISO 9001:2015, the term "//risks and opportunities//" is defined in ISO 14001:2015, "//Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use//".
Line 32: Line 26:
 potential adverse effects (threats) and potential beneficial effects (opportunities) potential adverse effects (threats) and potential beneficial effects (opportunities)
 </blockquote> </blockquote>
 +
 +Interestingly, while a definition for “risk” was added to the ISO 9000:2015, “//Quality management systems–Fundamentals and Vocabulary//”. Unfortunately, ISO struggles with properly defining the word "risk" (Ref.: [[articles:a_matter_of_risk|A Matter of "Risk"]]). Regardless of how ISO 9000:2015 defines "risk", ISO 14001:2015 makes it clear that "risks" are "threats". Therefore,  So, for the sake of simplicity, let's use the definition contained in [[https://www.monogramwebstore.org/publications/item.cgi?7a832d46-1fb0-4650-a57e-963108b9f71d|API Spec Q1, "Specification for Quality Management System Requirements for Manufacturing Organizations for the Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry" (Ninth Edition, June 2013)]], published by the [[https://www.api.org|American Petroleum Institute (API)]]. 
 +
 +<blockquote>**API Spec Q1** \\
 +3.1.19 risk \\
 +Situation or circumstance that has both a likelihood of occurring and a potentially negative consequence.</blockquote>
  
 ===== Is the use of "Preventive Action" still valid? ===== ===== Is the use of "Preventive Action" still valid? =====