Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
articles:re-writing_iso_9001_through_interpretation [2020/01/24 14:46]
rrandall [Re-writing ISO 9001:2015... through Interpretation]
articles:re-writing_iso_9001_through_interpretation [2020/01/24 14:50] (current)
rrandall [Re-writing ISO 9001:2015... through Interpretation]
Line 3: Line 3:
 ISO 9001:2015 was designed to include many ambiguous/​vague requirements because the responsible committee ([[https://​www.iso.org/​committee/​53896.html|ISO TC176/​SC2]]) was convinced that in order for the standard to be accepted by a large international user base, it must recognize //cultural relativism//​. Cultural relativism is the idea that a person'​s beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person'​s own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another. (See [[articles:​context_of_the_organization|Context of the Organization... and "​Interested Parties"​]]) ISO 9001:2015 was designed to include many ambiguous/​vague requirements because the responsible committee ([[https://​www.iso.org/​committee/​53896.html|ISO TC176/​SC2]]) was convinced that in order for the standard to be accepted by a large international user base, it must recognize //cultural relativism//​. Cultural relativism is the idea that a person'​s beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person'​s own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another. (See [[articles:​context_of_the_organization|Context of the Organization... and "​Interested Parties"​]])
  
-Consequently,​ interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 changes when crossing cultural boundaries. ​Orstated another way, interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:​2016 ​could be "//country ​dependent//"​.+Consequently,​ interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 changes when crossing cultural boundaries. ​And since culture is most often rooted in socio-political beliefseconomy, laws, regulations,​ etc., interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:​2016 ​are often "//nation ​dependent//"​.
  
 So "​who"​ provides interpretation?​ So "​who"​ provides interpretation?​
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 And there is a 3rd official "​clarifications"​ (i.e., interpretations) document from IAQG for AS 9100:2016: [[https://​www.sae.org/​iaqg/​projects/​9100-2016_clarification_table.pdf|"​IAQG AS 9100:2016 Series Clarifications"​]]. It states: "//​These clarifications are __binding__ where the standard leadership believes a published response is necessary since it has a profound impact upon the use of the standard or when a significant disputes exists.//"​ And there is a 3rd official "​clarifications"​ (i.e., interpretations) document from IAQG for AS 9100:2016: [[https://​www.sae.org/​iaqg/​projects/​9100-2016_clarification_table.pdf|"​IAQG AS 9100:2016 Series Clarifications"​]]. It states: "//​These clarifications are __binding__ where the standard leadership believes a published response is necessary since it has a profound impact upon the use of the standard or when a significant disputes exists.//"​
- 
  
 ===== How ASQ attempted to create a new requirement through Interpretation===== ===== How ASQ attempted to create a new requirement through Interpretation=====