Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
articles:as9100-under_revision [2024/01/07 13:04] – rrandallarticles:as9100-under_revision [2024/01/07 13:07] (current) – [Sub-tier Control] rrandall
Line 76: Line 76:
  
 __My thoughts...__ \\ __My thoughts...__ \\
-Provided that a company is effectively complying with "c" & "d." (above), I don't think that very many of the above requirements will be "applicable" to the vast majority of IA9100 companies.+Provided that a company is effectively complying with "a", "c" & "d." (above), I don't think that very many of the above requirements will be "applicable" to the vast majority of IA9100 companies.
  
 __Conclusion:__ \\ __Conclusion:__ \\
Line 86: Line 86:
  
 __My thoughts...__ \\ __My thoughts...__ \\
-This is simply an expansion of the requirement in Clause 8.4.1: \\ +This is simply an expansion of the current requirement in Clause 8.4.1: \\ 
-"The organization shall require that external providers apply appropriate controls to their direct and sub-tier external providers, to ensure that requirements are met." \\+//"The organization shall require that external providers apply appropriate controls to their direct and sub-tier external providers, to ensure that requirements are met."// \\
 Since the AS9100 "Clarifications" document (i.e., official interpretations) has "clarified" that ALL of 8.4.3 must be either flowed down to suppliers OR excluded with justification, this is just one more thing for companies to add to the "Supplier Requirements". \\ Since the AS9100 "Clarifications" document (i.e., official interpretations) has "clarified" that ALL of 8.4.3 must be either flowed down to suppliers OR excluded with justification, this is just one more thing for companies to add to the "Supplier Requirements". \\