Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
articles:iso_globalist_agenda [2020/03/19 21:28] – [ISO 9001:2015 and the “Made in China 2025" (MIC) Policy initiative] rrandall | articles:iso_globalist_agenda [2023/04/22 11:35] (current) – [How ISO 9001 promotes Globalism] rrandall | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===== What is a " | ===== What is a " | ||
- | <note important>The [[https:// | + | <WRAP left round info 60%> |
- | + | The [[https:// | |
- | NAZI Germany (1933-1945) had an economic policy called, "//Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz//," | + | </WRAP> |
- | + | <WRAP clear>< | |
- | {{ : | + | |
- | + | ||
- | This Socialist mantra is often repeated with slight variations, such as "//the welfare of the nation (or community) takes precedence over the selfishness of the individuals.//" | + | |
Line 28: | Line 25: | ||
==== IEC / ITU / ISO: 3 “sister” organizations ==== | ==== IEC / ITU / ISO: 3 “sister” organizations ==== | ||
- | The “International Telecommunication Union”, originally the “International Telegraph Union”, is a specialized agency of the United Nations that is responsible for issues that concern information and communication technologies.4 | + | The “International Telecommunication Union”, originally the “International Telegraph Union”, is a specialized agency of the United Nations that is responsible for issues that concern information and communication technologies.((https:// |
The ”International Electrotechnical Commission” (IEC), the “International Telecommunication Union” (ITU), and the “International Organization for Standardization” (ISO) consider themselves to be 3 global “sister” organizations working to develop International Standards for the world. | The ”International Electrotechnical Commission” (IEC), the “International Telecommunication Union” (ITU), and the “International Organization for Standardization” (ISO) consider themselves to be 3 global “sister” organizations working to develop International Standards for the world. | ||
Line 36: | Line 33: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | <note>Many ISO and IEC standards are issued jointly (e.g., ISO/IEC 17025). And both ISO and ISO/IEC Standards are normatively referenced in ITU-R Recommendations.</ | + | <WRAP center round info 80%> |
+ | Many ISO and IEC standards are issued jointly (e.g., ISO/IEC 17025). And both ISO and ISO/IEC Standards are normatively referenced in ITU-R Recommendations. | ||
+ | </WRAP> | ||
==== ISO Membership ==== | ==== ISO Membership ==== | ||
- | ISO (International Organization for Standardization) has 164 Member Nations, represented by their Standards Bodies. The vast majority of these National Standards Bodies are either: | + | ISO (International Organization for Standardization) has 164 Member Nations, represented by their Standards Bodies. The vast majority of these National Standards Bodies are either: |
- | Government entities | + | |
- | Quasi-government entities | + | |
Consequently, | Consequently, | ||
- | ISO Members representing government Standards Bodies include, but is not limited to: \\ | + | ISO Members representing government Standards Bodies include, but are not limited to: \\ |
- | (**BOLDED** nations __AREN' | + | (**BOLDED** nations __AREN' |
- | [{{ :articles:hassan_rouhani-photo.png? | + | [{{ :articles:ebrahim_raisi_2018.jpg? |
- | * Algeria (#155 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Algeria (#154 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Belarus (Totalitarian / #92 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Belarus (Totalitarian / #125 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * China (Communist / #126 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * China (Communist / #152 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Congo (#137 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Congo (#136 in "Human Freedom Index" |
* Cuba (Communist / Totalitarian) \\ | * Cuba (Communist / Totalitarian) \\ | ||
- | | + | * India (#112 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * **Indonesia (#81 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * **Indonesia (#85 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Iraq (#158 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Iraq (#157 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Iran (#154 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Iran (#162 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Kazakhstan (Totalitarian / #73 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Kazakhstan (Totalitarian / #107 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Kuwait (#124 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Kuwait (#113 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * **Lithuania (#22 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * **Lithuania (#17 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Malaysia (#106 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | |
- | * **Mexico (#92 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * **Mexico (#98 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Pakistan (#140 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Pakistan (#146 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * **Poland (#40 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * **Poland (#49 in "Human Freedom Index" |
* North Korea (Communist / Totalitarian) \\ | * North Korea (Communist / Totalitarian) \\ | ||
- | * **South Korea (#27 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * **South Korea (#30 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Russian Federation (#114 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Russian Federation (#119 in "Human Freedom Index" |
* Sri Lanka (#110 in "Human Freedom Index" | * Sri Lanka (#110 in "Human Freedom Index" | ||
- | * Sudan (#159 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Sudan (#160 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Syrian Arab Republic (Totalitarian / #162 (the bottom) in Cato's 2019 "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Syrian Arab Republic (Totalitarian / #165 (the bottom) in Cato's 2019 "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * Thailand (#103 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Thailand (#104 in "Human Freedom Index" |
- | * United Arab Emirates (#128 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * United Arab Emirates (#127 in "Human Freedom Index" |
* Uzbekistan (Totalitarian) \\ | * Uzbekistan (Totalitarian) \\ | ||
- | * Viet Nam (Communist / #117 in "Human Freedom Index" | + | * Vietnam |
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
~ Nigel H. Croft, ISO/TC 176/SC 2 Chair, 28 August 2012 ((Source: https:// | ~ Nigel H. Croft, ISO/TC 176/SC 2 Chair, 28 August 2012 ((Source: https:// | ||
- | It is critical to recognize that ISO is openly | + | It is critical to recognize that ISO is openly |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
For ISO 9001:2015, and several other ISO management system standards, this was primarily accomplished through “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” (Annex SL) mandating standardized language to be used in ALL ISO management system standards. This was done under the pretext of promoting consistency in integrated management systems. | For ISO 9001:2015, and several other ISO management system standards, this was primarily accomplished through “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” (Annex SL) mandating standardized language to be used in ALL ISO management system standards. This was done under the pretext of promoting consistency in integrated management systems. | ||
- | After some joint ISO/IEC management system standards (e.g. ISO 17020, ISO/IEC 17025) refused to adopt the Annex SL format, the “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” was revised (2019-05) such that Annex SL was re-named Annex L and its scope expanded to include IEC standards (in effect, “strong-arming” | + | After some joint ISO/IEC management system standards (e.g. ISO 17020, ISO/IEC 17025) refused to adopt the Annex SL format, the “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” was revised (2019-05) such that Annex SL was re-named Annex L and its scope expanded to include IEC standards (in effect, “strong-arming” |
- | An example of how ISO promotes communist and socialist ideologies can be found when reading ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2 “Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties”. And it accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176). | + | <WRAP center round important 80%> |
+ | Before anyone gets upset about the satirical ISO logo with a sword through it, please read: [[https:// | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The IEC " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== How ISO 9001 promotes Globalism ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The web page from which ISO provides [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | <WRAP clear></ | ||
+ | The boxes at the bottom of the graphic above correspond with the following UN [[https:// | ||
+ | 1 - [[https:// | ||
+ | 9 – [[https:// | ||
+ | 12 – [[https:// | ||
+ | 14 – [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | If you're unfamiliar with the language used by Globalists, the above goals all point toward a [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | One example of how ISO promotes communist and socialist ideologies can be found when reading ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2 “Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties”. And it accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176). | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
< | < | ||
- | interested party / stakeholder \\ | + | interested party/ |
person or organization that can affect, be affected by, or perceive itself to be affected by a decision or activity \\ | person or organization that can affect, be affected by, or perceive itself to be affected by a decision or activity \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 117: | Line 137: | ||
Also, ISO 9001:2015, Annex A.3 states: | Also, ISO 9001:2015, Annex A.3 states: | ||
< | < | ||
+ | ===== Which Country is " | ||
+ | |||
+ | When looking at [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | China (Communist / #152 in “Human Freedom Index”) leads in the number of ISO 9001:2015 certified organizations by a wide margin. Why? | ||
==== ISO 9001:2015 and the “Made in China 2025" (MIC) Policy initiative ==== | ==== ISO 9001:2015 and the “Made in China 2025" (MIC) Policy initiative ==== | ||
- | Some of the language in ISO 9001:2015 appears to have been introduced to support the “Made in China 2025" (MIC) Policy initiative. | + | Some of the language in ISO 9001:2015 appears to have been introduced to support the “[[https:// |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | A departure from the Hu-Wen administration' | + | A departure from the Hu-Wen administration' |
- | The inability of China' | + | The inability of China' |
- | Even after a reduction of reliance | + | Even after a reduction of reliance |