Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- articles:preventive_action_not_equal_to_risks_and_opportunities [2021/12/19 19:18] – [Preventive Action ≠ Risks and Opportunities?] rrandall
+++ articles:preventive_action_not_equal_to_risks_and_opportunities [2021/12/19 19:19] (current) – [Conclusion] rrandall
@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
   * [[https://www.monogramwebstore.org/publications/item.cgi?7a832d46-1fb0-4650-a57e-963108b9f71d|API Spec Q1, "Specification for Quality Management System Requirements for Manufacturing Organizations for the Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry" (Ninth Edition, June 2013)]]
 ===== Conclusion =====
-An organization can certainly continue to use “preventive actions” as a methodology within its ISO 9001:2015 or AS9100:2016 QMS. However, the only practical application of “preventive actions” would be for addressing "//assignable (special) cause variations//" identified in Statistical Control Charts.
+An organization can certainly continue to use “preventive actions” as a methodology within its ISO 9001:2015 or AS9100:2016 QMS.
 Supporting this, there is nothing stated in either the "[[https://committee.iso.org/files/live/sites/tc176sc2/files/documents/Interpretations/ISO9001_2015_Approved_Interpretations.doc|ISO/TC 176/SC 2 Listing of Approved Interpretations against ISO 9001:2015]]" or "[[https://asq.org/quality-resources/iso-9001/us-tc176|US TC 176 - TG22 - Interpretations]]" forbidding or restricting use of the "preventive action" methodology. And ISO 9000:2015 continues to recognize "preventive action" as a legitimate methodology (Ref. ISO 9000:2015, sec. 3.12.1).
+However, the most common practical application of “preventive actions” would be for addressing "//assignable (special) cause variations//" identified in Statistical Control Charts.