Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:how_iso_perpetuates_flawed_concepts [2023/05/17 09:57] – [Perpetuatuation of "flawed" Concepts] rrandallarticles:how_iso_perpetuates_flawed_concepts [2023/05/17 10:01] – [Perpetuatuation of "flawed" Concepts] rrandall
Line 44: Line 44:
 Obviously, if the company must define "corrective actions for nonconforming products and services detected after delivery", then it makes no sense to allow the establishment of ANY sampling plan (including c=0 plans) BECAUSE that sampling plan allows for an ACCEPTABLE number of defects to be shipped! \\  Obviously, if the company must define "corrective actions for nonconforming products and services detected after delivery", then it makes no sense to allow the establishment of ANY sampling plan (including c=0 plans) BECAUSE that sampling plan allows for an ACCEPTABLE number of defects to be shipped! \\ 
  \\   \\ 
-Even more interesting, AS9101F, sec. 3.3 defines a "Major Nonconformity as: \\ +Even if we adopt a more lax interpretation of the above requirement, AS9101F, sec. 3.3 defines a "Major Nonconformity as: \\ 
 //• any nonconformity that can result in the probable delivery of nonconforming product or service;// \\  //• any nonconformity that can result in the probable delivery of nonconforming product or service;// \\ 
  \\   \\