Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:optimizing_calibration_intervals [2019/03/17 18:33] – rrandallarticles:optimizing_calibration_intervals [2019/03/17 18:49] – [Optimizing Calibration Intervals] rrandall
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Optimizing Calibration Intervals ======+====== Reducing Waste through Optimizing Calibration Intervals ======
  
 One of the most often overlooked areas in Lean Six Sigma for reducing waste is the optimization of calibration (i.e., metrological confirmation) intervals. \\ One of the most often overlooked areas in Lean Six Sigma for reducing waste is the optimization of calibration (i.e., metrological confirmation) intervals. \\
Line 28: Line 28:
 A critical component when using this methodology is determining the percentage of the maximum permissible error. The higher the percentage, the greater the risk of an instrument being found Out-of-Tolerance (OOT); potentially resulting in nonconforming product escapes. The lower the percentage, the greater the cost associated with lowering the risk of an OOT condition; and reducing the potential for nonconforming product escapes. This percentage will often vary based upon the type of instrumentation to which it is applied. \\ A critical component when using this methodology is determining the percentage of the maximum permissible error. The higher the percentage, the greater the risk of an instrument being found Out-of-Tolerance (OOT); potentially resulting in nonconforming product escapes. The lower the percentage, the greater the cost associated with lowering the risk of an OOT condition; and reducing the potential for nonconforming product escapes. This percentage will often vary based upon the type of instrumentation to which it is applied. \\
  
-Most often companies establish a "range" (or "window) for the optimization. For example, IF an instrument is found exceeding 75% of its maximum permissible error, then the calibration interval is shortened. However, IF an instrument is consistently found below 50% of its maximum permissible error, then the calibration interval is lengthened. And IF the instrument is found between 50% and 75% of it's maximum permissible error, then the interval is considered acceptable.+Most often companies establish a "range" (or "window") for the optimization. For example, IF an instrument is found exceeding 75% of its maximum permissible error, then the calibration interval is shortened. However, IF an instrument is consistently found below 50% of its maximum permissible error, then the calibration interval is lengthened. And IF the instrument is found between 50% and 75% of it's maximum permissible error, then the interval is considered acceptable.
 ===== Initial Calibration Intervals ===== ===== Initial Calibration Intervals =====