Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- articles:soot [2025/07/26 21:46] – [What does this mean?] rrandall
+++ articles:soot [2025/07/26 21:48] (current) – [What does this mean?] rrandall
@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 Conclusion: \\
-This somewhat arbitrary approach toward defining a SOOT condition has little to do with determining whether the IMPACT of the Out--Of-Tolerance (OOT) condition. \\
+This somewhat arbitrary approach toward defining a SOOT condition has little to do with determining the IMPACT of the Out-Of-Tolerance (OOT) condition. \\
 If we know the product tolerance, and determine that it had been a 4:1 Accuracy Ration, then halving the calibration accuracy of the measuring device (which is what doubling the error does), means that a ≤2:1 Accuracy Ratio exists. That would indeed be significant. \\
@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 <wrap em>HOWEVER</wrap>, what if the measuring device was 10 times more accurate than the product tolerance? \\
-In that case, an error greater than twice the calibration tolerance would have reduced the Accuracy Ratio from 10:1 to 5:1. Since an Accuracy Ration would have still been greater than 4:1, the impact would have been insignificant.
+In that case, an error of twice the calibration tolerance would have simply reduced the Accuracy Ratio from 10:1 to 5:1. Since an Accuracy Ration would have still been greater than 4:1, the impact would have been insignificant.
 ===== Why was this added to their requirements? =====