Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
articles:as9100d_product_safety [2020/12/30 11:51] – [AS9100 - Product Safety] rrandall | articles:as9100d_product_safety [2022/03/18 06:54] – [What should you "really" do to address "Product Safety"?] rrandall | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
===== What should you " | ===== What should you " | ||
- | AS9100 is so poorly written that IAQG should be embarrassed. | + | AS9100 is so poorly written that IAQG should be embarrassed. |
Walter Sam O’Connor, Vice President - Technical Services for the [[https:// | Walter Sam O’Connor, Vice President - Technical Services for the [[https:// | ||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
It is a bit more challenging to identify specific actions that go above and beyond normal activities necessary to address the special considerations for " | It is a bit more challenging to identify specific actions that go above and beyond normal activities necessary to address the special considerations for " | ||
- | * Increase the measurement accuracy ratio between the measuring instrument used and the tolerance of the part. For example, if you normally maintain a Measurement Ratio nf 4:1, then increase that ratio to 10:1 in order to reduce the risk of that part being out of tolerance. | + | * Increase the measurement accuracy ratio between the measuring instrument used and the tolerance of the part. For example, if you normally maintain a Measurement Ratio of 4:1, then increase that ratio to 10:1 in order to reduce the risk of that part being out of tolerance. |
* Add inspection points (e.g., human or automated, using different techniques) to enhance verification that the product conforms to its requirements. | * Add inspection points (e.g., human or automated, using different techniques) to enhance verification that the product conforms to its requirements. | ||
* Add " | * Add " |