Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Last revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| articles:auditing_7.1.5 [2023/07/20 20:53] – [6 - Using a Precision Micrometer to calibrate Gage Blocks] rrandall | articles:auditing_7.1.5 [2023/07/20 20:55] – [7 - Relocted Weighing Scale] rrandall | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 238: | Line 238: | ||
| - mechanical and thermal conditions during transportation that likely altered the performance of the instrument? \\ | - mechanical and thermal conditions during transportation that likely altered the performance of the instrument? \\ | ||
| - | If the answer is no, and there is no other evidence to the contrary, this should be a Major nonconformance because we must assume that there is a high degree of probability that product quality (or quantity) has been affected. However, if the auditee has appropriate test weights (mass) providing an acceptable calibration accuracy ratio, and can verify that the weighing scale is in-tolerance during the audit, then this can be graded as a Minor Nonconformity. | + | If the answer is no, and there is no other evidence to the contrary, this should be a Major nonconformance because we must assume that there is a high degree of probability that product quality (or quantity) has been affected. However, if the auditee has appropriate test weights (mass) providing an acceptable calibration accuracy ratio, and can verify that the weighing scale is in-tolerance during the audit, then this can be graded as a Minor Nonconformity |
| The basis for this nonconformity is found in [[https:// | The basis for this nonconformity is found in [[https:// | ||
