Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
articles:context_of_the_organization [2019/08/02 07:50] – rrandall | articles:context_of_the_organization [2019/10/24 10:15] – [Context of the Organization... and "Interested Parties"] rrandall | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Context of the Organization... and " | ====== Context of the Organization... and " | ||
- | Context of the Organization... and " | + | While poorly described in ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016, the "Context of the Organization"... and " |
- | When reading ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2 “Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties”, the interpretation varies depending upon whether the country is communist, socialist (closed or restricted economies) or a free society with a free market economy. | + | This means that interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 changes when crossing cultural boundaries. Or, stated another way, interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 is " |
+ | |||
+ | Recognizing that some of the requirements contained in ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 involve socio-politically driven requirements, | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, when reading ISO 9001: | ||
This accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176). | This accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176). | ||
Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | For example: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Fortunately, | Fortunately, | ||
Line 22: | Line 31: | ||
“//There is no requirement in this International Standard for the organization to consider interested parties where it has decided that those parties are not relevant to its quality management system. It is for the organization to decide if a particular requirement of a relevant interested party is relevant to its quality management system.// | “//There is no requirement in this International Standard for the organization to consider interested parties where it has decided that those parties are not relevant to its quality management system. It is for the organization to decide if a particular requirement of a relevant interested party is relevant to its quality management system.// | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | ISO 9001:2015, Annex A.3 makes this "// | + | ISO 9001:2015, Annex A.3 makes this "// |
\\ | \\ | ||
+ | ===== Additional AS 9100:2016 (Rev. D) Requirement ===== | ||
- | Unlike ISO 9001:2015, AS 9100:2016 requires "the organization" | + | Unlike ISO 9001:2015, AS 9100: |
+ | |||
+ | An example | ||
^ Interested Party ^ Requirement(s) | ^ Interested Party ^ Requirement(s) | ||
| Customers | | Customers | ||
- | | U.S. Department of State | Defined in the “International Traffic in Arms Regulations” (22 CFR 120-130), when applicable. | + | | U.S. Department of State | Defined in the [[https:// |
- | | U.S. Department of Defense | + | | U.S. Department of Defense |
\\ | \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | Example | + | An example |
^ Interested Party ^ Requirement(s) | ^ Interested Party ^ Requirement(s) |