Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- articles:context_of_the_organization [2019/08/29 20:00] – [Context of the Organization... and "Interested Parties"] rrandall
+++ articles:context_of_the_organization [2019/10/24 10:21] – [Context of the Organization... and "Interested Parties"] rrandall
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 This means that interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 changes when crossing cultural boundaries. Or, stated another way, interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 is "country dependent".
+This is why there are 2 separate "official" interpretations for ISO 9001:2015 plus a 3rd for AS 9100:
+  - [[https://committee.iso.org/files/live/sites/tc176sc2/files/documents/Interpretations/ISO9001_2015_Approved_Interpretations.doc|Official ISO 9001:2015 Inerpretations from ISO TC/176/SC2]]
 Recognizing that some of the requirements contained in ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 involve socio-politically driven requirements, one can easily understand how this severely limits the value of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016.
@@ Line 20: / Line 25: @@
 \\
 ----
+For example:
+{{ :articles:china-i_m_a_stakeholder.jpg?direct |}}
 Fortunately, ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2b, effectively re-defines an “interested party” (relevant to the quality management system) as a “party” invoking **quality-related requirements**. \\