Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- articles:iso17025-2017_oe_requirements-1 [2019/08/31 15:30] – rrandall
+++ articles:iso17025-2017_oe_requirements-1 [2019/09/01 09:33] – rrandall
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
-<note tip>**# 1 ** \\ For information on how to create/craft the language of the "__range of laboratory activities__" reference: [[https://anab.qualtraxcloud.com/ShowDocument.aspx?ID=9161|ANAB ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS RULE: PREPARING A DRAFT SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION FOR ISO/IEC 17025 TESTING LABORATORIES]]</note>
+<note tip>**# 1 ** \\ For information on how to create/craft the language of the "__range of laboratory activities__" reference ANAB Administrative Process Rule: \\ • [[https://anab.qualtraxcloud.com/ShowDocument.aspx?ID=9162|PREPARING A DRAFT SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION FOR ISO/IEC 17025 CALIBRATION LABORATORIES]] \\ • [[https://anab.qualtraxcloud.com/ShowDocument.aspx?ID=9161|PREPARING A DRAFT SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION FOR ISO/IEC 17025 TESTING LABORATORIES]]</note>
-<note important>**# 3** \\ When asked "//Is it allowable for an organization to claim non-applicability with any sub-clause or sub-paragraph of 9100-series?//", the response contained in the IAQG official [[https://www.sae.org/iaqg/projects/9100-2016_clarification_table.pdf|"AS 9100:2016 Series Clarifications"]] stated: \\ //"Yes. Organizations can claim non- applicability even down to a shall statement or portions of a shall statement."// \\ \\ Also, when asked "//Is it required that any non-applicability with a requirement be documented in the scope section of the __Quality Manual__?//", the response contained in the IAQG official [[https://www.sae.org/iaqg/projects/9100-2016_clarification_table.pdf|"AS 9100:2016 Series Clarifications"]] stated: \\ //"No. It is required that any non-applicability with a clause or “shall” statement be documented information but does not have to be documented in the scope section of a __Quality Manual__."//</note>