Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
articles:iso_globalist_agenda [2020/03/01 14:17] – [How ISO is using Management Systems Standards to promote Globalism] rrandall | articles:iso_globalist_agenda [2020/03/01 14:28] – [How ISO is using Management Systems Standards to promote Globalism] rrandall | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
//ISO/TC 176/SC 2’s vision is for its products (primarily ISO 9001 and ISO 9004) to be “recognized and respected worldwide, and used by organizations as an integral component of their sustainable development initiatives”.// | //ISO/TC 176/SC 2’s vision is for its products (primarily ISO 9001 and ISO 9004) to be “recognized and respected worldwide, and used by organizations as an integral component of their sustainable development initiatives”.// | ||
~ Nigel H. Croft, ISO/TC 176/SC 2 Chair, 28 August 2012 ((Source: https:// | ~ Nigel H. Croft, ISO/TC 176/SC 2 Chair, 28 August 2012 ((Source: https:// | ||
- | {{ : | ||
It is critical to recognize that ISO is openly biased toward promoting communist and socialist ideologies through the UN globalist agenda. | It is critical to recognize that ISO is openly biased toward promoting communist and socialist ideologies through the UN globalist agenda. | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
For ISO 9001:2015, and several other ISO management system standards, this was primarily accomplished through “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” (Annex SL) mandating standardized language to be used in ALL ISO management system standards. This was done under the pretext of promoting consistency in integrated management systems. | For ISO 9001:2015, and several other ISO management system standards, this was primarily accomplished through “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” (Annex SL) mandating standardized language to be used in ALL ISO management system standards. This was done under the pretext of promoting consistency in integrated management systems. | ||
- | After some joint ISO/IEC management system standards (e.g. ISO 17020, ISO/IEC 17025) refused to adopt the Annex SL format, the “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” was revised (2019-05) such that Annex SL was re-named Annex L and its scope expanded to include IEC standards (in effect, “strong-arming” them). From the perspective of the standards developers opposing “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1”, perhaps ISO should modify their logo to more closely resemble the modified | + | After some joint ISO/IEC management system standards (e.g. ISO 17020, ISO/IEC 17025) refused to adopt the Annex SL format, the “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1” was revised (2019-05) such that Annex SL was re-named Annex L and its scope expanded to include IEC standards (in effect, “strong-arming” them). From the perspective of the standards developers opposing “ISO/IEC Directives – Part 1”, perhaps ISO should modify their logo to more closely resemble the Federation logo seen in [[https:// |
An example of how ISO promotes communist and socialist ideologies can be found when reading ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2 “Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties”. And it accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176). | An example of how ISO promotes communist and socialist ideologies can be found when reading ISO 9001:2015, sec. 4.2 “Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties”. And it accounts for the following definition being completely incongruent with businesses operating in a free society with a free-market economy (the “Example” having been added by TC 176). |