| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision |
| articles:iso_globalist_agenda [2020/03/01 14:28] – [How ISO is using Management Systems Standards to promote Globalism] rrandall | articles:iso_globalist_agenda [2021/11/20 12:51] – [ISO Membership] rrandall |
|---|
| ISO Members representing government Standards Bodies include, but is not limited to: \\ | ISO Members representing government Standards Bodies include, but is not limited to: \\ |
| (**BOLDED** nations __AREN'T__ communist, totalitarian, or outside of the Cato Institute's 2019 top 100 ranked most free nations) \\ | (**BOLDED** nations __AREN'T__ communist, totalitarian, or outside of the Cato Institute's 2019 top 100 ranked most free nations) \\ |
| [{{ :articles:hassan_rouhani-photo.png?nolink&350|ISO is so important, the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran (I.R.I), currently Hassan Rouhani, is also the President of the “Supreme Council of Standards” (a full member of ISO) AND is ex officio the chairman of the Iranian “Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution”.}}] | [{{ :articles:hassan_rouhani-photo.png?nolink&350|ISO is so important, the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran (I.R.I), previously Hassan Rouhani, is also the President of the “Supreme Council of Standards” (a full member of ISO) AND is ex officio the chairman of the Iranian “Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution”.}}] |
| * Algeria (#155 in "Human Freedom Index") \\ | * Algeria (#155 in "Human Freedom Index") \\ |
| * Belarus (Totalitarian / #92 in "Human Freedom Index") \\ | * Belarus (Totalitarian / #92 in "Human Freedom Index") \\ |
| The inability of China's communist leadership to understand the concepts of free-trade and free markets led to several miscalculations in dealing with the Trump Administration. On March 22, 2018, the USTR (Office of the United States Trade Representative) announced “action against four broad Chinese MIC policies, including (1) forced technology transfer, (2) unfair licensing requirements, (3) government-backed cyber-theft of U.S. trade secrets, and (4) efforts by China to acquire U.S. technology and IP through acquisitions to support its industrial plans.”((Source: The Made in China 2025 Initiative: Economic Implications for the United States - Updated April 12, 2019)) | The inability of China's communist leadership to understand the concepts of free-trade and free markets led to several miscalculations in dealing with the Trump Administration. On March 22, 2018, the USTR (Office of the United States Trade Representative) announced “action against four broad Chinese MIC policies, including (1) forced technology transfer, (2) unfair licensing requirements, (3) government-backed cyber-theft of U.S. trade secrets, and (4) efforts by China to acquire U.S. technology and IP through acquisitions to support its industrial plans.”((Source: The Made in China 2025 Initiative: Economic Implications for the United States - Updated April 12, 2019)) |
| |
| Even after a reduction of reliance of China (due to tarrifs), during February 2020 the United States Stock Market felt the effects of US industry remaining so heavily dependent upon China. | Even after a reduction of reliance of China (due to tarrifs), during February 2020 the United States Stock Market felt the effects of US industry remaining so heavily dependent upon China when the COVID-19 pandemic began sweeping the world. |
| |
