Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:nist_traceability [2019/11/20 07:38] – [An "unbroken chain of calibrations" to what?] rrandallarticles:nist_traceability [2019/11/20 07:46] – [An "unbroken chain of calibrations" to what?] rrandall
Line 53: Line 53:
 Sec. 820.72 Inspection, measuring, and test equipment. \\ Sec. 820.72 Inspection, measuring, and test equipment. \\
 (b) (1) Calibration standards. Calibration standards used for inspection, measuring, and test equipment shall be __traceable to national or international standards__. If national or international standards are not practical or available, the manufacturer shall use an independent reproducible standard. If no applicable standard exists, the manufacturer shall establish and maintain an in-house standard.</WRAP> (b) (1) Calibration standards. Calibration standards used for inspection, measuring, and test equipment shall be __traceable to national or international standards__. If national or international standards are not practical or available, the manufacturer shall use an independent reproducible standard. If no applicable standard exists, the manufacturer shall establish and maintain an in-house standard.</WRAP>
 +
 +And [[https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/6200.4G.pdf|FAA National Policy - Order 6200.4G]]" (dated 03/08/10) states:
 +
 +<WRAP center round box 80%>
 +Appendix 2 - Definitions \\
 +h. Calibration Standard - a device or instrument used as a basis to calibrate measure, gage, test, inspect, or otherwise examine basic accuracy values. The standard has a higher order of accuracy than the examined item and is traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).</WRAP>
  
 In contrast, ISO 17025:2017 is much more modern and technically correct in stating:\\ In contrast, ISO 17025:2017 is much more modern and technically correct in stating:\\