Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
articles:pbs_rp_program [2023/02/11 14:35] – rrandallarticles:pbs_rp_program [2023/05/15 09:56] (current) – rrandall
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 Existing AS9100 Registered companies have the option to apply for the "Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process" (Described in [[https://www.sae.org/standards/content/as9104/1a/|SAE AS9104/1A]], "Appendix D"). This option allows for a 33% Reduction in the Audit Duration (Maximum of 50%). The criteria for this option are defined in AS9104/1A, "//Table D.1 - Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process Requirements//".  Existing AS9100 Registered companies have the option to apply for the "Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process" (Described in [[https://www.sae.org/standards/content/as9104/1a/|SAE AS9104/1A]], "Appendix D"). This option allows for a 33% Reduction in the Audit Duration (Maximum of 50%). The criteria for this option are defined in AS9104/1A, "//Table D.1 - Performance-based Surveillance/Recertification Process Requirements//". 
 +
 +<WRAP center round important 80%>
 +As of May 2023 I've learned that ANAB has added requirements that will make compliance with the PBS/RP virtually impossible. And several CBs are already discouraging companies from opting into this program.
 +</WRAP>
  
 ^  Table D.1 - Performance based surveillance/recertification process qualification  ^ ^  Table D.1 - Performance based surveillance/recertification process qualification  ^
Line 22: Line 26:
  
 <WRAP center round info 80%> <WRAP center round info 80%>
-I asked an AS9104/1A committee member "how" the AS9100 Auditors would be determining compliance with ISO 19011. His response was "//Based on our conversations within the writing team, the __intent__ of that standard is what they are going for.//" (sic) However, he also noted that "//the IAQG could always come out with a clear ruling//" (sic) at a later date.+I asked an AS9104/1A committee member "how" the AS9100 Auditors would be determining compliance with ISO 19011. His response was that the word "should" must be read as "shall".
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 35: Line 39:
 A better alternative is "Supplier Scorecards" provided by larger aerospace customers (e.g., Boeing, Lockheed, Raytheon) or [[https://www.cpars.gov/|CPARs (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System)]] provided by government customers. However, these are not always available. A better alternative is "Supplier Scorecards" provided by larger aerospace customers (e.g., Boeing, Lockheed, Raytheon) or [[https://www.cpars.gov/|CPARs (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System)]] provided by government customers. However, these are not always available.
  
 +{{page>wiki:pathforward}}