Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
articles:preventive_action_not_equal_to_risks_and_opportunities [2020/07/10 09:39] – [Conclusion] rrandallarticles:preventive_action_not_equal_to_risks_and_opportunities [2021/12/17 17:49] – [Preventive Action ≠ Risks and Opportunities?] rrandall
Line 18: Line 18:
 Compounding the confusion, some organizations decided to use the same form for both corrective and preventive action (CAPA).  Compounding the confusion, some organizations decided to use the same form for both corrective and preventive action (CAPA). 
  
-ISO 9001:2015 replaced the concept of “preventive action” with the more expanded “risks and opportunities” (in section 6.1). Upon reading ISO 9001:2015, take note that it repeatedly uses the term “//risks and opportunities//” as __two separate concepts__ (in sections 4.4f, 5.1.2b, 6.1, 9.1.3e, 9.3.2e & 10.2.1e). +In ISO 9001:2015 the requirement for “preventive action” had been removed. And many viewed the concept as having been replaced with the more expanded of “risks and opportunities” (in section 6.1). Auditor training emphasized that this was not the case. Instead, “//risks and opportunities//” were not to be considered during the planning. This becomes obvious when reading the requirement: 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +Upon reading ISO 9001:2015, take note that it repeatedly uses the term “//risks and opportunities//” as __two separate concepts__ (in sections 4.4f, 5.1.2b, 6.1, 9.1.3e, 9.3.2e & 10.2.1e). 
  
 While not defined in ISO 9000:2015 or ISO 9001:2015, the term "//risks and opportunities//" is defined in ISO 14001:2015, "//Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use//". While not defined in ISO 9000:2015 or ISO 9001:2015, the term "//risks and opportunities//" is defined in ISO 14001:2015, "//Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use//".