Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
articles:process_related_links [2023/02/04 11:33] – rrandall | articles:process_related_links [2023/02/04 12:03] – [Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985)] rrandall | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
- | [[ :flowchart| Flowcharting Symbology / Conventions]] (Based upon [[https:// | + | The suite of BPMN symbols is included in all major flowcharting software programs (e.g., [[https:// |
- | + | ||
- | Note 1: While still valid, ISO 5807:1985 is extremely antiquated. Preference should be given to using the " | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Note 2: The suite of BPMN symbols is included in all major flowcharting software programs (e.g., [[https:// | + | |
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
Line 17: | Line 13: | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985) ==== | ||
+ | While still valid, ISO 5807:1985 (re-affirmed in 2019) is extremely antiquated. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[ :flowchart| Flowcharting Symbology / Conventions]] (Based upon [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Preference should be given to using the OMG " | ||
+ | |||
+ | You may wonder that if ISO 5807:1985 is so antiquated, why hasn't ISO adopted BPMN. It has. ISO/IEC 19510:2013 (reaffirmed in 2022) is identical to OMG [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then why should you pay for " | ||
+ | |||
+ | The only answer I can offer is that ignorance can be expensive. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||