Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
articles:qms_vs_iso9001_cert_mgmnt_system [2023/05/25 18:24] – [How a QMS is different from a "Certified Management System"] rrandall | articles:qms_vs_iso9001_cert_mgmnt_system [2023/12/08 08:09] (current) – [But our customers demand we hold a QMS Certification...] rrandall | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Market to customers who perceive value in the "QMS Certification" | * Market to customers who perceive value in the "QMS Certification" | ||
- | While there is a significant overlap between | + | While these two systems |
+ | {{ : | ||
Here are some indicators that this dual system is in place: | Here are some indicators that this dual system is in place: | ||
Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
=== Auditor Competence === | === Auditor Competence === | ||
- | ISO 9001:2015 was designed to be both simple (entry-level) and generic. However, many of the ISO 9001 & AS91xx auditors still rely on outdated information | + | ISO 9001:2015 was designed to be both simple (entry-level) and generic. However, many of the ISO 9001 & AS91xx auditors still rely on outdated information |
- | Case-in-point, | + | Case-in-point, |
- | I've witnessed multiple Auditors complain and even issue nonconformities simply because they did not understand the logic of how the company had interpreted and applied the standard. While these invalid nonconformities should be appealed, far too many companies lack personnel with the knowledge, skills, and ability to submit a proper [[articles: | + | I've witnessed multiple Auditors complain, and even issue nonconformities, simply because they did not understand the logic of how the company had interpreted and applied the standard. While these invalid nonconformities should be appealed, far too many companies lack personnel with the knowledge, skills, and ability to submit a proper [[articles: |
{{page> | {{page> |