Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- articles:re-writing_iso_9001_through_interpretation [2020/01/24 14:38] – [Re-writing ISO 9001:2015... through Interpretation] rrandall
+++ articles:re-writing_iso_9001_through_interpretation [2020/01/24 14:46] – [Re-writing ISO 9001:2015... through Interpretation] rrandall
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Re-writing ISO 9001:2015... through Interpretation ======
-ISO 9001:2015 was designed to include many ambiguous/vague requirements because the responsible committee ([[https://www.iso.org/committee/53896.html|ISO TC176/SC2]]) was convinced that in order for the standard to be accepted by a large international user base, it must recognize //cultural relativism//. Cultural relativism is the idea that a person's beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another.
+ISO 9001:2015 was designed to include many ambiguous/vague requirements because the responsible committee ([[https://www.iso.org/committee/53896.html|ISO TC176/SC2]]) was convinced that in order for the standard to be accepted by a large international user base, it must recognize //cultural relativism//. Cultural relativism is the idea that a person's beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another. (See [[articles:context_of_the_organization|Context of the Organization... and "Interested Parties"]])
 Consequently, interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 changes when crossing cultural boundaries. Or, stated another way, interpretation of the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 & AS 9100:2016 could be "//country dependent//".