Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
articles:risk-based_audits [2023/02/17 21:20] – [Risk-Based Internal Audits] rrandallarticles:risk-based_audits [2023/02/17 21:21] (current) – [Pitfalls to defining Risk-based Audit Planning Criteria] rrandall
Line 51: Line 51:
   * monitoring and measuring equipment have a high accuracy ratio (i.e., the ratio between the instrument and the tolerance measured), e/g., ≥10:1.   * monitoring and measuring equipment have a high accuracy ratio (i.e., the ratio between the instrument and the tolerance measured), e/g., ≥10:1.
  
-<note tip>As you define the risk-based audit criteria for your organization... you will likely realize that the information from previous internal audits is not entirely adequate to support risk-based audit planning! Any shortcomings in the previous internal audit reports should be addressed by better defining the specific "objective evidence" to be recorded - so as to better support (or enhance) effective risk-based audit planning. Be sure to differentiate between "objective evidence" that contributes toward a more effective audit vs "non-value-added" information.</note>+<WRAP center round tip 80%>As you define the risk-based audit criteria for your organization... you will likely realize that the information from previous internal audits is not entirely adequate to support risk-based audit planning! Any shortcomings in the previous internal audit reports should be addressed by better defining the specific "objective evidence" to be recorded - so as to better support (or enhance) effective risk-based audit planning. Be sure to differentiate between "objective evidence" that contributes toward a more effective audit vs "non-value-added" information.</WRAP>
 ==== Internal Audit Program Risk ==== ==== Internal Audit Program Risk ====