Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
articles:those_who_fail_to_plan [2020/05/12 12:02] – rrandall | articles:those_who_fail_to_plan [2020/07/31 14:26] – rrandall | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
One of the best and most effective tools for performing a structured RCA is the Ishikawa Fishbone chart (shown below). Fishbone charts typically categorize problems through the 6 Ms (Manpower, Materials, Measurements, | One of the best and most effective tools for performing a structured RCA is the Ishikawa Fishbone chart (shown below). Fishbone charts typically categorize problems through the 6 Ms (Manpower, Materials, Measurements, | ||
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
And Fishbone charts are commonly used as a structured approach to identifying " | And Fishbone charts are commonly used as a structured approach to identifying " | ||
- | Had a series of PFMEAs (Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) been completed during the planning stage, virtually all of the above "root causes" | + | Had a series of PFMEAs (Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) been completed during the planning stage, virtually all of the "root causes" |
Very few of the companies I've visited have ever performed any PFMEAs as part of their planning. IF they had, then the costs associated with their product returns, customer complaints, and performing individual Root Cause Analysis (RCAs) and Corrective Actions would have been dramatically reduced. | Very few of the companies I've visited have ever performed any PFMEAs as part of their planning. IF they had, then the costs associated with their product returns, customer complaints, and performing individual Root Cause Analysis (RCAs) and Corrective Actions would have been dramatically reduced. |