Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
services:quality_management_support_services [2024/01/16 20:51] – [Our Value Proposition] rrandallservices:quality_management_support_services [2024/01/17 15:47] – [Our Value Proposition] rrandall
Line 44: Line 44:
 Also, much of the QMS development can be performed __remotely/virtually__.  Also, much of the QMS development can be performed __remotely/virtually__. 
  
-==== THe Disadvantages of the DIY Approach ====+<WRAP center round tip 80%> 
 +For AS91xx ✈️ companies, we may be able to achieve greater savings by implementing all of the requirements to obtain a low overall “risk rating” under the “[[articles:ocap|Organization Certification Analysis Process (OCAP)]]”.</WRAP> 
 +==== The DIY Trap ====
  
 Many micro (≤10 employees) and small (11-50 employees) companies underestimate the work required to implement ISO 9001 / AS9100 or AS9120 and try to save money by utilizing existing personnel with little or no knowledge, skills, and experience in these standards or the certification process. This leads to lengthy and inefficient implementations... which overburdens these employees whose primary job experiences a loss in efficiency. Managers often respond to this by hiring a consultant... who trains the employee. However, due to the consultant "assisting" rather than taking ownership of developing and implementing the QMS, the time delays are extended... leading to further loss of potential contracts. Many micro (≤10 employees) and small (11-50 employees) companies underestimate the work required to implement ISO 9001 / AS9100 or AS9120 and try to save money by utilizing existing personnel with little or no knowledge, skills, and experience in these standards or the certification process. This leads to lengthy and inefficient implementations... which overburdens these employees whose primary job experiences a loss in efficiency. Managers often respond to this by hiring a consultant... who trains the employee. However, due to the consultant "assisting" rather than taking ownership of developing and implementing the QMS, the time delays are extended... leading to further loss of potential contracts.
Line 53: Line 55:
  
 While medium-sized companies (51-500 employees) typically have a formal QMS in place, they often lack personnel with the knowledge, skills, and experience to efficiently manage the QMS "Certification Process". This leads to Quality personnel sacrificing time from their day-to-day activities (and your customers) to learn about the standard(s) and the certification process (often learned through trial and error). Once the Certification is achieved, the existing Quality staff will continue to be distracted from their day-to-day activities when preparing for the annual 3rd Party Audits. While medium-sized companies (51-500 employees) typically have a formal QMS in place, they often lack personnel with the knowledge, skills, and experience to efficiently manage the QMS "Certification Process". This leads to Quality personnel sacrificing time from their day-to-day activities (and your customers) to learn about the standard(s) and the certification process (often learned through trial and error). Once the Certification is achieved, the existing Quality staff will continue to be distracted from their day-to-day activities when preparing for the annual 3rd Party Audits.
- 
-<WRAP center round tip 80%> 
-For AS91xx ✈️ companies, we may be able to achieve greater savings by implementing all of the requirements to obtain a low overall “risk rating” under the “[[articles:ocap|Organization Certification Analysis Process (OCAP)]]” requirements.</WRAP> 
  
 ---- ----