Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| articles:process_related_links [2023/02/04 19:01] – [Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985)] rrandall | articles:process_related_links [2023/02/04 19:04] (current) – [Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985)] rrandall | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ==== Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985) ==== | ==== Legacy Flowcharting Symbols (ISO 5807:1985) ==== | ||
| - | While still valid, ISO 5807:1985 (re-affirmed in 2019) is extremely antiquated. Preference should be given to using the " | + | While still valid, ISO 5807:1985 (re-affirmed in 2019) is extremely antiquated. |
| [[ :flowchart| Flowcharting Symbology / Conventions]] (Based upon [[https:// | [[ :flowchart| Flowcharting Symbology / Conventions]] (Based upon [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Preference should be given to using the OMG " | ||
| You may wonder that if ISO 5807:1985 is so antiquated, why hasn't ISO adopted BPMN. It has. ISO/IEC 19510:2013 (reaffirmed in 2022) is identical to OMG [[https:// | You may wonder that if ISO 5807:1985 is so antiquated, why hasn't ISO adopted BPMN. It has. ISO/IEC 19510:2013 (reaffirmed in 2022) is identical to OMG [[https:// | ||
| Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
| Then why should you pay for " | Then why should you pay for " | ||
| + | The only answer I can offer is that ignorance (and resistance to change) can be expensive. | ||

